Global Policy Forum

Multilateral Agreement on Investment

 

3253842434_b84d76ab72_n
Picture Credit: flickr.com/Daveness_98

In May 1995, the OECD began negotiations on a Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI). The US, eager to avoid interference from poor countries, considered the OECD Council a "safe" body since only rich countries are members of the organization. Secret negotiations took place from 1995 until 1997 when an OECD source leaked a copy of the draft agreement to a Canadian citizen group. The leak revealed that the MAI sought to establish a new body of universal investment laws that would guarantee corporations unconditional rights to buy, sell and do financial operations all over the world, without any regard for national laws and citizens' rights. The draft gave corporations a right to sue governments if national health, labor or environment legislation threatened their interests. However, the negotiations failed in 1998 when first France, and then other countries, successively withdrew after pressure from a global movement of NGOs, citizens groups and governments of poor countries. MAI opponents saw the agreement as a threat to nationalsovereignty and democracy and argued that it would lead to a "race to the bottom" in environmental and labor standards. The failure of the MAI negotiations proved a success for the global movement against the MAI. However, rich governments continue to push for similar investment provisions in regional trade agreements and the World Trade Organization (WTO). At the WTO Ministerial in Cancun in September 2003, the richer WTO members tried to introduce a Multilateral Investment Agreement (MIA) through the "Singapore" issues. These efforts failed again, however, as a group of more than twenty poor countries united in demanding a fairer trade deal. This page follows the MAI and other related initiatives on international investment.


Articles on the Multilateral Investment Agreement (MIA) in the WTO




After Trade, a Mess over Investment (September 5, 2003)

Rich countries that benefited from protectionist investment regimes in the past now seek liberalization through the WTO's Multilateral Investment Agreement. This article says an investment agreement will obstruct poor countries' development of their domestic economies. (Inter Press Service)

Globalization Fight Continues (July 22, 2003)

Citizen protest killed the OECD Multilateral Agreement on Investments in 1998, so now rich countries turn to the WTO to shape investment rules that they contend will spur the flow of global capital. But poor countries need basic public goods before enlarged private sector investment. (Toronto Star)

A Critical Analysis of the Proposed Investment Treaty in WTO (July 2003)

The former director of UNCTAD's Trade Program criticizes the Multilateral Investment Agreement (MIA) and evaluates the drawbacks and benefits of foreign direct investment. The MIA will protect foreign investors and limit the ability of developing countries to manage FDI. (WTroubleO)

Corporate Conquistadors in Cancun (July 2003)

The European Commission lobbies for a WTO-Multilateral Investment Agreement to advance European corporate interests in foreign markets. Narrow agendas negotiated before Cancun undermine opportunities for civic action and open-ended dialogue with poor member countries at the WTO. (Investment Watch)

NGOs Organize Against Proposed WTO Investment Agreement (June 23, 2003)

Rich countries want the WTO to protect investors' rights, but leading NGOs argue that such a move would weaken the ability of poor countries to protect their workers and the natural environment. (One World)

Unlimited Companies. The Developmental Impacts of an Investment Agreement at the WTO (June 2003)

Action Aid argues that the European Union and Japan, the major proponents of an investment agreement at the WTO, do not aim at helping poor countries but at securing improved conditions and greater protection for their own multinationals.

Investment and the WTO – Busting the Myths (June 2003)

In this briefing paper, the World Development Movement and Friends of the Earth explode some of the myths surrounding foreign direct investment and the "benefits" of an investment agreement in the WTO.

Foreign Investment Regulation in Historical Perspective (March 2003)

Professor Ha-Joon Chang notes that today's richest countries never pursued policies to blindly attract foreign investment, which they now pressure poor countries to adopt under the proposed WTO Multilateral Investment Agreement. (Third World Network)

 


Articles on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) in the OECD

A Concise Guide to the Multilateral Agreement on Investment - Supporters' and Opponents' Views

The Preamble Center for Public Policy gives a summary of the proposed Multilateral Agreement on Investment, and presents the sharply contrasting views of supporters and opponents.

No to Global Investment Treaty (June 1999)

Norway opposes MAI in WTO: "The Government meets the demands of the free trade sceptics and says a clear no to negotiations on a global investment treaty."

Seattle a MAI-Free Zone (April 12, 1999)

Seattle, the host city of the up-coming WTO Ministerial, declared itself an MAI Free-Zone by unanimous vote in the City Council. Press Release, text of City Council's Resolution and links to further information.

From Bretton Woods to the MAI: Finance and Silence (January 1999)

Noam Chomsky, in Le Monde Diplomatique, charts major international finance developments since Bretton Woods.

Militarism and MAI (Winter/Spring 1999)

An in depth essay from the Earth Island Journal arguing against the MAI as a potentially dangerous alliance between arms and corporations.

The Financial Monster that Tried to Eat Australia (December 11, 1998)

Normura International found guilty of illegal trading, but, contrary to the exclamations of MAI's pundits, further boundaries on trading strategies need to be established to protect stable economies worldwide. (Sydney Morning Herald)

Let's Develop Humane Global Investing (April 18, 1998)

A Canadian perspective about the MAI and its implications. (The Toronto Star)

NGOs Mount Protest Against MAI (April 1998)

An article by Martin Khor, Third World Network.

The Dangers of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (March 1998)

A detailed article on the MAI by Nuri Albala. (Le Monde diplomatique)

The Dangers of the MAI. Wielding Power Behind the Scenes (March 1998)

The role of the OECD in the negotiations on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment. (Le Monde diplomatique)

The Impact of the MAI on Employment, Growth, and Income Distribution (November 1997)

Background analysis and explanation of how MAI fits into the neoliberal agenda.

Multilateral Misgivings (September 22, 1997)

Article from Alternatives which looks at the MAI and how various unlikely partners have united to oppose it.

Council of Canadians' Web Site on MAI

Provides citizens' alternatives and further information.

The NGO Pocket Trade Lawyer for the MAI

A helpful guide for a better understanding of international treaties.

Writing the Constitution of a Single Global Economy: A Concise Guide to the MAI Supporters' and Opponents' Views

Article from Preamble Center on the different positions towards the MAI.

Transnational Corporate Bill of Rights - The Multilateral Agreement on Investment

Article by Andrea Durbin of Friends of the Earth, sharply critical of the MAI, an investment agreement being negotiated under the auspices of the OECD.

Worse Than NAFTA

A commentary on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment from the Preamble Center for Public Policy.

"MAI: Foreign Affairs in Annapolis"

An article from the Washington Postby Fred Hiatt, who discusses activity in the Maryland state legislature.

MAI Shell Game

A further commentary by Friends of the Earth.

The MAI reborn

IMF change of bylaws gives it unprecedented power over national capital controls. (Friends of the Earth)

WCC Warns Churches of Proposed Multilateral Agreement on Investment

 


Links and Resources

MAI Documentation from Negotiation

This site provides documents and progress reports on MAI up to 1998. A table of contents outlines the topics included in MAI discussion by OECD members. OECD no longer tracks the progress of the MAI.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

An international organization of delegates and experts funded by 30 developed countries. OECD provides nations and multi-lateral financial institutions with policy deliberations and statistics based on its scientific and economic research of globalization issues.

The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

The United Nations Commission on Human Rights on human rights as a necessary objective of trade, investment and financial policy.

Multilaterial Agreement on Investment - Fact Sheet

Fact sheet from Friends of the Earth critical on this controversial proposal by the OECD.
 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C ß 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.