Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations
Global Policy Forum Monitors Policy Making at the United Nations.
 
Security Council UN Finance What's New
Social & Economic Policy International Justice Opinion Forum
Globalization Tables & Charts
Nations & States Empire Links & Resources
NGOs UN Reform  
Secretary General   DONATE NOW
 
Milosevic and the Al Capone Dimension - International Justice - Global Policy Forum

Milosevic and the Al Capone Dimension

By Chris Stephen

Institute for War and Peace Reporting
April 11, 2003

Al Capone is not an inmate of The Hague war crimes court. It just feels like it. As estimates for the time needed to finish the Slobodan Milosevic trial stretch into infinity, the name of this Chicago mobster is forever on people’s lips.

Capone is famous to most people as a gangster. But to lawyers, he is famous for another reason: When the courts failed to find witnesses willing to testify to his killings, they instead got him for tax evasion.

Now the same argument is being used about Milosevic – why go through the whole trial, when he can probably be jailed for life for just a part of it? The former president is charged with an avalanche of war crimes spread over three separate wars. If even a fraction of these charges, in just one of the wars, are proved, Milosevic, now 62, will spend the rest of his life in prison.

So why, critics ask, insist on prosecuting him for all three wars? This problem has become acute because Milosevic is sick. His sickness, moreover, is for high blood pressure, partly induced by the strain of defending himself. The more the trial goes on, the greater the strain, the more days are lost, and the longer the trial goes on.

Critics of the prosecutors say they should cut and run: The Kosovo evidence is already done. Assuming he is found guilty, that should be enough. The alternative is the present situation. The prosecution evidence for all three wars is expected to carry on at least until July – 18 months of court time since his trial began. Mr Milosevic then has the right to the same amount of time for his defence case – so proceedings are likely to continue until the end of 2005.

For prosecutors, the nightmare is that Milosevic’s constitution won’t stand it. Either he will die from the strain, or else be ruled too sick for the trial to continue. If this happens, many will wish he had been jailed sooner, for less.

But prosecutors insist the trial is about more than just putting a man away. The Security Council created this court to ensure peace and security. This means exposing the full extent of the crimes that Milosevic is accused of. It also means providing justice not just for the guilty, but also for the victims – with the victims in Bosnia and Croatia also given a chance to hear the full horror of what happened in their countries.

Prosecutors have chalked up some big successes – persuading witnesses from inside the Milosevic machine to give high grade evidence. This has not been easy. They will also be fortified by former tribunal president Antonio Cassese, who in the early days of the court urged the UN to bear in mind the suffering of the victims, and the duty to support a court that could hopefully circumvent the need for revenge.

For the prosecutors, there is little choice than to take part in what amounts to a gamble. The gamble is that they can get through all the evidence, in all the wars, to show the full extent of subversion, corruption and tyranny they claim Milosevic engaged in. If they fail – if Milosevic becomes too sick to continue – the result could be a feeling of anticlimax that would overshadow the history of this court.

But success would see the tribunal vindicated. It might also show that the world has turned a corner – and that even the greatest of the great are no longer free to commit war crimes with impunity. Chris Stephen is IWPR’s project manager in The Hague.


More Information on War Crimes Tribunals
More Information on International Justice

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


GPF home page