Global Policy Forum

Funding for NGOs

Print

NGOs rely on money from a variety of sources, including individual donors, foundations, corporations, and governments. Often what an NGO can and cannot do is tied to where the money comes from, dramatically affecting the effectiveness and neutrality of NGOs. While some NGOs, like GPF, refuse to accept government or corporate funding to stay independent in their decision making, many NGOs need depend on these funding sources in order to operate. Funding Issues have become particularly challenging, following the economic crisis.  This section examines how NGOs are funded, and how funding sources affect NGO operations.


Articles

2012 | 2011| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | Archived Articles

2012

Hired Gun Fight (July 18, 2011)

Rajiv Shah, the administrator of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), is fighting to channel US foreign aid through local institutions rather than American for-profit contractors, in order to increase accountability and aid effectiveness. The Coalition of International Development Companies, an advocacy coalition of 50 government contractors, have objected to the procurement reform stressing the threat of waste and corruption by foreign governments and other institutions. Shah’s aggressive push for paradigm shift is stirring the development world to rethink accountability.   (Foreign Policy)

2011

Foreign Funding Critical for NGO Survival (October 18, 2011)

Nottingham University’s Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade released a study looking at  the impact of foreign funding on NGOs, specifically why some NGOs survive, why NGOs attract foreign donors, and how many NGOs funded by foreign donors legitimately provide aid and how many are set up as “shell companies. ” The study examined NGOs in Uganda, where the numbers rose from 3,500 to 7,000 between 2002 to 2008. The study found that whether or not an NGO received foreign funding or grants was the biggest factor for its survival, rather than the effectiveness.   Moreover, the study found that allocation for foreign funding is neither fair nor effective, and is generally awarded based on habit rather than merit.  (IRIN)

Horn of Africa Aid Must Also Build Long-Term Resilience (July 27, 2011)

This IRIN article asserts that the Horn of Africa famine “symbolizes a failure to act in time,” because the famine could have been prevented had humanitarian aid been applied effectively. The author argues that investing in preventative measures is more effective than responding after a crisis has begun. Preemptive aid is especially necessary as the cost and frequency of disasters have increased significantly, and many countries can no longer afford to repeatedly pay for short-term disaster relief. As the famine continues, it is important that countries and various aid organizations refine long-term disaster prevention techniques in order to prevent future crises.

Record Donor Aid, Record Costs (July 20, 2011)

Development Initiatives, an aid watchdog organization, released a report analyzing the relationship between aid donations and aid costs. In 2010, countries donated a record number of monetary aid, but the report recommends that countries invest in long term disaster prevention. Otherwise, given that the cost and frequency of disasters has increased significantly, countries risk paying repeatedly for short-term disaster relief. Moreover, the report argues that NGO aid reporting needs to be “standardized” in order to see who is donating aid money and where it is going. Several countries, particularly the US, spend significant amounts of money in military aid, yet the money is rarely reported.

Watching Aid Fall Short (May 20, 2011)

In 2010, the European Union fell short of its development aid targets by 15 billion euros.  A study by the Concord coalition of advocacy organizations predicts that the situation is likely to get worse rather than improve in the coming years, due in part to state practices that inflate aid budgets and the economic crises faced by Greece, Ireland and Portugal.  An ongoing shortfall in aid threatens the sustainability of NGO activities and may mean development targets are not met. (IPS)

President Housing Project Competes with NGO's for Funds  (April 6, 2011)

Botswana is a middle-income country, and one of the most stable in Africa. Nonetheless, it confronts serious social and economic issues – including a very high rate of HIV/AIDs. The relative stability of Botswana has meant international aid has shifted to countries with more acute problems. Government and NGOs are now in competition for limited local private sector funds.  The private sector has favored government programs, which has led NGOs to form alliances to pursue funds. (The Botswana Gazette)

Sri Lanka: NGOs Face Funding Gap and Government Scrutiny  (March 15, 2011)

The NGO community in Sri Lanka is being assailed by the government, which purportedly sees these organizations as its opposition in governance.  The state is particularly concerned about funding of local NGOs by foreign governments.  These NGOs are viewed as the tools by which foreign powers are able to influence internal political affairs.  The obscured influence of foreign governments through NGOs is a legitimate concern.  However, this should not be used as an excuse for suppression of valid critics and opposition movements. (IPS)

Money can Taint NGO's Clean Image (Febraury 10, 2011)

The Seub Nakhasatien Foundation, a prominent Thai environmental NGO, has accepted 25.89 million baht - approx 851,000 USD - from the energy company Petroleum Authority of Thailand (PTT).  In the 1990s, the Foundation campaigned against a gas pipeline built by PTT through the Huay Kayeng forest reserve.  By accepting sponsorship from PTT, the Foundation exposes itself to the firm's influence.  Regardless of whether PTT exercises actual influence over the Foundation's environmental agenda, the appearance that it does is enough to damage the NGO's credibility. (Bangkok Post)

NGO Hopes to Benefit from Failure (January 17, 2011)

In the competitive world of NGO fundraising, conventional wisdom holds that disclosing your failures is not a smart move, as "donors demand results and punish failure".  Yet Engineers Without Borders is doing just that, setting up a website to document mistakes it, and other NGOs, have made in projects.  The website is meant to help NGOs learn from their failures.  It also sets these NGOs apart from other groups, potentially a clever tactic to attract the allusive donor dollar. (The Guardian)

2010

Many Charities May Be In Breach of New Equality Law (April 21, 2010)

In the UK, many charities and NGOs may find themselves in breach of the law when the new Equality Act comes into operation in October. The new legislation - which consolidates and replaces the Race Relations Act, the Sex Discrimination Act and the Disability Discrimination Act - will impose higher legal thresholds on organizations which rely on "charitable instrument exemptions" to "positively discriminate" by providing benefits and services only to specific members of the public. This could also lead to a drop in funding for those are unable to fulfill the wishes of donors who insist on the specific use of their gifts. (Civil Society Media)

Fast Developing India is Putting NGOs Out of Business (January 9, 2010)

International funding agencies and foreign governments are hesitant to fund Indian NGOs. Due to positive economic projections, many no longer recognize India as a "poor nation" and have removed it from their list of countries that require funding. Decreased government spending on NGOs due to the global financial crisis further complicates the situation. (Mumbai Mirror)

2009

USAID Rejects NGO Concerns over Aid Militarization (December 2, 2009)

Humanitarian NGOs have turned down aid from the US because it requires cooperation with the military. USAID argues that military- NGO cooperation is needed when aid workers operate in insecure areas, but the organizations fear that the presence of military will jeopardize their relations with the local communities. According to the head of the UN humanitarian office in Afghanistan, aid should purely be based on the needs of the civilians. If aid has any other motive, the natural reaction of the community will be hostility towards the NGOs. (Irinnews)

Donor Caution Alarms Aid Workers (November 6, 2009)

Governments, notably the US, are hesitant to support humanitarian NGOs in Somalia. Due to the security situation, they are concerned that their funds or supplies might reach armed forces or insurgent groups. The NGOs disagree with these concerns, arguing that even in dangerous areas, strong relations with local partners ensure an appropriate delivery process. (Irin News)

Global: Less Money for More Work - the NGO Double Whammy (April 21, 2009)

Foundations saw their assets decline by almost 22 percent in 2008, which will mean a substantial drop in their funding to NGOs. Individual donors are also cutting their contributions. The decreased resources is forcing NGOs to reduce programmes and staff, but many NGOs are also trying to find and attract new sources of funding. Some NGOs ask corporations for support and the NGOs that accept and rely on government funding currently have more secure funds, but at what costs? If major NGOs let governments and corporations dominate their funding, the sector could face problems of independence and credibility more serious even than financial problems. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

Global: Individuals Give NGOs More Funds Than Donors (March 13, 2009)

The think-tank Development Initiatives found that 51 percent of humanitarian funding for NGOs comes from private sources. With private funds NGOs can respond within hours or days to emergencies. In contrast, it takes most Development Assistance Committee (DAC) donors six weeks to disburse funds. However, in the wake of the economic crisis, many private contributors are reducing their donations. This volatility in funding could affect 19 of the largest humanitarian non-profit networks that together spend 60 percent of global humanitarian funding. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

Is the Economic Mess Going to Kill 100, 000 Non-Profits? (March 13, 2009)

A professor from New York University has predicted that 100, 000 US non-profits will go under in the coming two years due to the economic crisis. Along these lines, the author Eyal Press provides concrete examples of how non-profits in the US see funding sources disappear. Has there been a non-profit bubble? If so, the best case scenario would be more careful spending by all actors in society leading to a reduction in the number of illegitimate non-profits and more effective work by those that survive the crisis. In the worst case, important humanitarian work would be lost, which would directly affect the most vulnerable in society. (AlterNet)

2008

Why Fundraising May Flourish While Business Flounders (December 15, 2008)

Fundraising for charities and NGOs continues to do well despite economic downturns, but donation from individuals increase in a slower pace. This article argues that fundraisers are used to proving impact and "telling compelling stories" since they aspire to build a long term relationship with individual donors. Surveys also show that individuals have more trust in charity organisations than in businesses and governments.(Canadian Fundraiser)

Foundations Stand by Aid Commitments – So Far (December 2, 2008)

In spite of the current global economic crisis, foundations are committed to maintaining stable aid funding levels and will have to "dig deeper into their endowments." Many foundations have handled the crisis by diversifying their investments, but if the crisis turns into a long term downturn, they will have to make cuts and will not be able to develop new programs. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

Mixed Picture on Private Donations as Financial Crisis Bites (November 28, 2008)

This article argues that the effects of the global financial crisis are variable and that it is still too early to foresee the long term impact. Many NGOs report that the number of donations have not dropped compared to previous years, but that people donate smaller amounts. Other NGOs state that the growth is smaller than what they had originally expected, but that they are not facing an overall decrease in funding. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

From Intelligent Funder to Intelligent Recipient: Civil Society Intermediary Role in Delivering Change (November 21, 2008)

This article draws on experiences in post-communist countries in Eastern Europe, where international donors financially supported any NGOs that claimed to strengthen democracy and foster liberalization. The author highlights the absence of clear and realistic goals for both funders and local NGOs and argues they need to establish comprehensible indicators of what they wish to achieve. Further, international donors should allocate more funding to improve the capacity of local NGOs to carry out fundraising and strategic planning. (CIVICUS)

Tight Belts, Tough Choices for Charities (November 13, 2008)

The global financial crisis affects the income of humanitarian NGOs who now deal with decreased funding by trying to make their operations more efficient. For many NGOs, reducing their current programs and cutting back on humanitarian relief is a measure of last resort. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

NGOs Pare Down in Face of Financial Crisis (October 27, 2008)

Many donors, especially corporate donors in the financial sector, have reduced their donations to NGOs due to the global financial crisis. To cut down costs, a large number of NGOs are revising their programs and laying off staff. Funding from governments, institutions and other individuals now play an increasingly important role in preventing the crisis from affecting the poorest. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

Credit Crisis Rattle Civil Society (October 24, 2008)

Donors in rich countries are cutting back on their aid funding because of the international financial crisis. NGOs in aid-recipient countries now have to compete for less money. In Cambodia for example, NGOs worry that donors will cancel hundreds of millions of dollars of development aid. (Phnom Penh Post)

Charity Coffers Face Credit Crunch (September 26, 2008)

NGOs worry that the Wall Street crisis will tempt governments to reduce international aid and make investors more cautious about supporting development projects. The economic crisis also affects individual donors, who have already lowered their donations to charity organizations. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

What Happens to Aid Money? (September 23, 2008)

ActionAid, UK Aid Network, Data/ONE, and a group of other NGOs initiated the Publish What You Fund (PWYF) campaign to urge donors to better share information about development aid funding. It encourages donors to give timely and accessible information on how they will spend their money and it also ranks donors according to how much access they give the public to their planning documents and their financial situation. (Integrated Regional Information Networks)

The Rise and Fall of Donor Funding for Advocacy NGOs: Understanding the Impact (August 2008)

Over the past decade, donor funding for Asian advocacy NGOs has experienced a cycle of dramatic rise and decline. Deficiency of domestic sources has led to increased NGO dependence on international donors. This article explores challenges faced by Asian advocacy NGOs in balancing funding needs with neutrality demands. It discusses the risks of asymmetric donor-NGO relationships, and claims that NGOs which align their activities and objectives to follow donor priorities will be seen as lacking independence and legitimacy. (Journal of Development in Practice)

Not Many Speak Their Mind to Gates Foundation (August 3, 2008)

The Gates Foundation, with its US$38 billion endowment, plays a dominant role in financing development and fighting disease in poor countries and few grant recipients dare to openly criticize the foundation since they risk losing their funding. But analysts from academia and think tanks argue the foundation should take part in discussions on how it can improve its work, and also share information about both successful and less successful programs. (Seattle Times)

China, NGOs and Accountability (April 8, 2008)

Private donations account for almost 90 percent of NGO funding in China and the government has had more of a "monitoring" role than a "facilitating" one. This article describes how NGOs can strengthen their independence and credibility through examining each other's work and involving the people they serve. (openDemocracy)

The Global Links Initiative Story (March 11, 2008)

There are numerous NGOs in urban areas in China, but none can acquire non-profit status due to the lack of a legal framework. Without access to domestic funding, Chinese NGOs must rely on international aid. But as the Chinese economy develops, donor countries and foundations are decreasing their financial support. The absence of NGO help during the heavy 2008 snow storms in Southern China is a tragic consequence. This article by the executive director of Global Links Initiative looks to the emerging class of "new rich" Chinese philanthropists to remedy the domestic funding dilemma. (Policy Innovations)

Online Philanthropy Markets - from 'Feel-Good' Giving to Effective Social Investing? (January 2008)

"Online philanthropy markets" is a recent internet development which allows individuals to easily engage with and invest money in organizations and small entrepreneurs all over the world. This paper by the Aspen Institute argues that individual donors should not think of themselves as providers of short term relief, but act as "investors for social change". It therefore recommends creating common reporting frameworks and independent data sets online that allow "investors" to compare the performance of the different NGOs.

2007

Silences in NGO Discourse: The Role and Future of NGOs in Africa (2007)

This collection of essays argues that NGOs are Africa's new missionaries. They dispense services in a spirit of "charity and pity" as puppets of "neo-colonial" powers. NGOs rely on their funding partners in a paternalistic relationship where foreign "true friends" – as one US ambassador termed donors – treat the poor as recipients of aid and exclude citizens from policy-making. The author recommends that NGOs in Africa stop pretending neutrality and engage in political activism. (Fahamu)

Shifting the Focus: What Is the Role of Grantmakers in Enabling NGO Accountability? (May 2007)

This article urges donors to "recognize that they are just one of many stakeholder groups that NGOs should be accountable to." The author critically assesses the "upwards accountability perspective" with rigid project monitoring, and recommends "downward accountability" which for example would allow those who are affected by the work of the NGOs to participate more.(One World Trust)

2006

 

Does Foreign Funding Make NGOs into Puppets? (October 11, 2006)

In light of a debate among Turkish NGOs on the subject of credibility, this New Anatolian article examines the sometimes obscure relationship between NGOs and their sources of funding. By stipulating conditions for the use of funds, foreign donors can strongly influence recipient groups, which raises questions about the NGOs' accountability to the communities they serve. Therefore, legitimate NGOs must display openness about – and independence from – their financial supporters to maintain their "honor" and credibility with the citizenry.

Strengthening Democratic Governance: The Role of Civil Society (September 21, 2006)

This Wilton Park report delves into the challenges that grassroots organizations face in their efforts to promote government accountability and citizen participation. In their intertwined activities of advocacy, monitoring and providing services, NGOs often encounter government interference, unreasonable donor demands and questions about their own legitimacy. The report encourages NGOs to focus on attaining sustainable results and to "not be diverted" in their operations by such obstacles.

Managing Globalization: Bad News Traveling Faster, But So Is Aid (August 22, 2006)

As technological developments allow news to travel faster, aid groups can better alert potential donors. Furthermore, international aid agencies have begun to solicit donations from individuals and groups on a global scale, rather than just in the wealthiest countries. However, although widespread coverage may benefit aid collections, it may also endanger aid workers who wish to remain inconspicuous in conflict-ridden zones. (International Herald Tribune)

How Genuine Are NGOs? (August 7, 2006)

According to this New Times opinion piece, western donors, particularly the US, have historically used NGOs to exploit economic opportunities in poor countries or to counter hostile political ideologies. Citing US-led wars and the ensuing relief efforts in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, the author strongly criticizes what he calls the "mockery of humanitarian aid." This occurs when donor nations use NGOs to provide humanitarian assistance in countries occupied by their troops. The article concludes that government-dependent NGOs work more to attract funds than to strengthen democracy.

All (Reasonably) Quiet on NGO Front- For Now (June 21, 2006)

The NGO community in South Africa fears that Pretoria's threat to introduce laws to prevent whistleblowing will discourage NGOs from voicing their concerns about government policies. NGOs that actively lobby for policy change also tend to receive less funding than NGOs which only provide services. This TerraViva article draws attention to the limits that financing problems and conservative legislation can impose on NGOs' activities.

Aid Harmonization: Challenges for Civil Society (May 2006)

This newsletter from the International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC) looks at how the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness affects NGOs as providers of international aid. The declaration urges governments to transfer aid directly into the budgets of poor countries, rather than funding their own development projects. While this could prevent rich countries from using aid as a tool to achieve their own political and economic interests, INTRAC warns that Northern NGOs could lose much of their funding and political influence. Southern NGOs, although benefiting from poor countries' increased aid budget, could lose their political independence since national governments would fully decide which NGOs to fund.

2005

 

NGOs Tiptoe through Africa's Political Minefields (October 11, 2005)

Spurred by fears of neocolonialism, many African governments view NGOs as "Trojan horses for Western governments." Many Northern NGOs receive a large amount of funding from their own governments, and are thus inclined to support that government's foreign policies on the ground. Countries like Eritrea, Zimbabwe and the Sudan have passed laws limiting the functionality of foreign-funded NGOs within their borders. Critics of these new policies accuse the African governments of espousing undemocratic values, and attempting to conceal human rights abuses. (Reuters)

Russia: Putin 'Foreign Funding' Remarks Draw Civil Society Concerns (July 21, 2005)

Russian President Vladimir Putin accused foreign-funded NGOs of serving "dubious group and commercial interests," and instead offered financial support from the Kremlin. While some experts applaud Putin's proposal, it seems very unlikely that a "not free"-rated country would support groups that monitor human rights abuses and that criticize the stifled political atmosphere. (Radio Free Liberty/Radio Europe)

Welcome to the Aid Business! (June 26, 2005)

The number of NGOs in Africa has increased from a few hundred to over 25,000 in about fifty years and their work goes beyond humanitarian aid. This article argues that the growing presence of foreign NGOs, or the "army of outsiders" as the author puts it, both results from, and causes Africa's slow development process. NGOs are now part of an aid business and spend over US$4 billion on recruiting staff from outside the continent. (openDemocracy)

Do Donors and NGOs Speak the Same Language? – Part II (April-June 2005)

While the influence of large and wealthy international NGOs continues to grow, governments and donors still tend to regard small, local grassroots groups as less important and less "legitimate" actors. Citing trends in Lesotho, this article criticizes the seemingly paternalistic attitude of foreign donor organizations, which sometimes "drastically" change their funding schemes without consulting recipient NGOs. The author urges greater financial and strategic support for NGOs, saying a lack of funding could "cripple the democratic function of civil society." (Lesotho Council of NGOs)

Do Donors and NGOs Speak the Same Language? – Part I (April-June 2005)

This article discusses the issue of foreign donors channeling funds for NGOs through local governments, focusing specifically on Lesotho. The author suggests that due to the often underdeveloped administrative capacity of fledgling democracies, funds may not trickle down to the groups that most need financial support. Additionally, those organizations that monitor government policymaking risk losing their credibility if they receive state-controlled aid. Therefore, donors must establish "deeper partnerships" with NGOs in order to better understand and strengthen their work. (Lesotho Council of NGOs)

Stop Sending Us Money, French Aid Group Says (January 4, 2005)

Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) has angered some NGO community members by asking donors to send money to the medical aid agency's general funds rather than specifically for Asian tsunami relief. The unprecedented move was to ensure "honesty" for MSF donors about where their funds go. But other NGOs claim MSF's report was "irresponsible" because it failed to clarify that other organizations, which focus on long term assistance rather than emergency relief, still want and need funding. (MSNBC)

Archived Articles

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C ß 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.