Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations |
| ||||||||||||
Committee Recommends Two Non-Governmental Organizations for Consultative Status With Economic and Social Council -Global Policy Forum- NGOs Committee Recommends Two Non-Governmental Organizations
UN Press Release
for Consultative Status With Economic and Social Council
May 20, 2002
The Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) this afternoon recommended two organizations for consultative status with the Economic and Social Council and the reclassification of one more. Following a briefing this morning by the Chief of the NGO Section, support was expressed for a number of measures, including increased staffing and a trust fund to support regional networks of NGOs.
The 19-member Committee uses a variety of criteria to recommend general, special and roster status to the Council, including mandates, governance and financing. Organizations that have general and special consultative status can attend meetings of the Council and circulate statements of a certain length; those with general status can, in addition, speak at meetings and propose items for the Council's agenda. Organizations with roster status can only attend meetings.
This afternoon, as it considered new applications and new requests for reclassification, the Committee recommended the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences based in the Russian Federation, for general status ad referendum, meaning that the decision would be revisited in the current session.
The Committee recommended special status for United States-based Kiwanis International, but left pending an application for general status by the international NGO Focus on the Family, also based in the United States, which has more than 2 million members in 164 countries.
The Committee recommended reclassification from roster to special status for the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, based in Canada. It left pending the reclassification applications of two international NGOs: the Rome-based February '74 Centre for Research and Documentation (CERFE), and the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM), based in the Netherlands.
Information on the organizations considered today is contained in documents E/C.2/2002/R.2 and Add.1 and Add.5, and E/C.2/2002/R.3.
Earlier today, the Chief of the NGO Section, Hanifa Mezoui, drew attention to the backlog of new applications and deferrals awaiting processing and review. Steady growth in the number of applications over the years had outpaced the Section's capacity to deal with them. There was also the trend of rising deferrals of applications from one session to the next, which had nearly doubled since 1999.
Among the possible remedial measures she cited were imposing a processing fee, limiting the number of applications accepted each year, declaring a moratorium on any new application until that backlog was cleared up, and increasing the Section's staff. Such proposals could be discussed in the Committee's working group, she suggested.
Most of the 15 speakers who responded to the briefing called it critical and forward-looking. As evidence of the support for creating a trust fund to support regional networks of NGOs, the representative of the Sudan indicated that a draft text on the matter might be introduced later in the session. That delegate, along with several others, called for a review of Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31, which concerned accreditation processes but included no specific rules for deferred applications.
The underrepresentation of NGOs from Africa deserved attention, some speakers stressed. In 2002, the a speaker noted, only 10 per cent of NGOs with consultative status came from the African continent, whereas the largest number of Member States per continent were from Africa. That question deserved close consideration given the aim of equal representation from all regions of the world, he said.
Another speaker suggested posting an NGO officer at United Nations regional offices around the world to inform local NGOs about their options with respect to participating in the work of the United Nations. Such an officer could also monitor the performance and activities of NGOs already holding consultative status.
Broad support was expressed for strengthening the capacity of the Secretariat by increasing staff to offset the growing volume of work. Noting that the number of NGOs accredited to the United Nations since 1996 had doubled from approximately 1,000 to more than 2,000 in 2002, one representative suggested limiting the number of applications or having a "break" year to reduce the backlog.
Participating in the discussion on strengthening the NGO Section were the representatives of France, Sudan, Germany, Senegal, China, Russian Federation, Tunisia, Algeria, Colombia, Pakistan and Cuba. Observers participated from Egypt, Israel, Nigeria and Iran.
More Information on NGOs More Information on NGOs and the UN
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
