Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations |
| ||||||||||||
Analysis on Regional Organizations and UN Peacekeeping - Global Policy Forum - Security Council Regional Organizations and Peacekeeping:
Articles, Analysis, and Opinions
NATO | EU and OSCE | Africa | Other| Regional Organization Links NATO
NATO’s Role in Nation-Building (August 17, 2005)
“Nation- building, peace-building or stabilization operations, depending on one’s preferred terminology, have become the dominant paradigm for the use of armed force in the post-Cold War world,” says former US diplomat James Dobbins. Acknowledging that the primary responsibility and most success in peacekeeping lies with the United Nations, Dobbins draws several conclusions emphasizing the positive role NATO and other regional organizations can play in the new era of post-conflict intervention. (New York Jewish Times)NATO Runs Short of Troops to Expand Afghan Peacekeeping (September 18, 2004)
In October 2003 , the Security Council mandated that NATO expand its peacekeeping presence beyond Kabul into provincial Afghanistan. However, governments have been reluctant to contribute troops to the increasingly unstable countryside, thus hindering the expansion of ISAF. Provincial areas, where 80 percent of the population lives, remain open to the influence of drug lords and Taliban forces, undermining the interim government and raising fears about security for the upcoming elections. (New York Times)NATO Boss Pleads for Afghan Focus (June 19, 2004)
NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer criticized member nations for failing to deliver resources to foreign missions which they have undertaken, most notably in Afghanistan. He urged NATO members to "devise a formula that both encourages and enables nations to honor their collective decisions and commitments." (BBC)NATO Enters New Era with Eastward Expansion (March 28, 2004)
While the accession of Eastern bloc countries to NATO symbolizes the removal of the "final brick" from the Berlin Wall and strengthen the military alliance's power, its preoccupation with peacekeeping missions around the world has called its raison d'etre into question, argues David Keohane, a defense expert at the Center for European Reform. (Deutsche Welle)Under-Pressure US Sounds Out NATO for Help in Hotspots (December 6, 2003)
The debate over Iraq involvement poses the biggest challenge to NATO in its 54-year history, reports Agence France Presse. After taking over the Afghanistan security force, NATO remains noncommittal about possible extended involvement in Iraq.Reinforcements Unlikely (October 8, 2003)
Despite US wishes, NATO seems unlikely to deploy peacekeepers to Iraq due to its commitments in Afghanistan, Bosnia and other countries. Yet it continues to consider establishing a rapid-deployment force and has planned a "crisis management study session" to explore methods of crisis response. (Rocky Mountain News)NATO Agrees to Widen Afghan Force (October 6, 2003)
A NATO official confirmed that a German-led "Provincial Reconstruction Team" (PRT) will deploy to a Northern Afghan town, and that NATO agrees "in principal" to expand the ISAF mission outside the capital city Kabul. This move may expedite the nationwide militia disarmament initiative. (Agence France Presse)NATO to Take Command in Afghanistan (August 11, 2003)
NATO prepares to assume the lead role in the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. The Afghan government welcomes the new arrangement, which will provide continuity to a mission that currently changes leadership every six months. (Associated Press)Expanded NATO Looks for New Role (November 22, 2002)
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization approves seven new members and creates a rapid-reaction force of 20,000 soldiers from all member nations. Experts see this military development as a way for NATO to prove its relevance to the US while adding a new feature to the war on terrorism. (Christian Science Monitor)Euro-Trashing (May 29, 2002)
Despite disparaging attitudes in Washington and US unilateralism, NATO remains relevant to international security. “Low” defense budgets do not diminish Europe’s ability and commitment to finance and engage in military operations in Afghanistan or Kosovo. (The Washington Post)NATO Offers Peacekeepers Planning Aid (April 11, 2002)
In an attempt to play a larger role in the campaign against terrorism, NATO’s secretary general offered to help plan the Turkish-led peacekeeping mission in Afghanistan. (New York Times )Combining Combat Readiness and Compassion (Summer 2001)
As NATO forces increasingly engage in "multi-faceted" operations that combine both military and humanitarian objectives, integrating NGOs into the process is crucial in establishing an armed force with "combat readiness [and] compassion." (NATO Review)Analysis: Behind NATO Show of Unity: Some Vexing Issues (April 23, 1999)
Deutsche Presse-Agentur report on the link being drawn by one US Senator between European support for international institutions such as the ICC, and what he calls "a new form of isolationism emerging in Europe", manifesting itself in "excessive, passive reliance upon international law and international institutions such as the United Nations and the International Criminal Court to provide the sole defence of our common interests and values".The High Cost of NATO (April 23, 1999)
William D. Hartung's analyzes the costs of NATO operations, exemplified by the airstrike against Kosovo, and compares them with the considerably lower cost of UN and OSCE conflict prevention.NATO and UN Involvement in Bosnia
A site at California Institute of Technology that documents relations between NATO and the UN in military operations in Bosnia. Site includes information and links. An interesting case that sheds light on the complexities of peacekeeping and the UN as a military enterprise.Why World Should Reject NATO Strikes? (May 4, 1999)
A profound and very insightful analysis of US foreign policy, exemplified by the Kosovo war, the situtation in East Timor and other conflicts all over the world. Steven Gan states that "they like war and Governments who keep buying guns from them".European Union and Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe
In Congo, a Cosmetic EU Operation (June 12, 2006)
This article questions the reasons behind the deployment of additional EU troops in support of MONUC before the elections in the DRC. The authors argue that the mission has more to do with bolstering the credibility of the European Security and Defense Policy than improving the situation on the ground in the DRC, and deplore that it took more than four months for the EU to respond to the UN request. Deploying only 2000 peacekeepers to the capital Kinshasa, rather than to the eastern provinces where anarchy threatens to undermine the poll, offers further evidence of the cosmetic nature of the long promised operation. (International Herald Tribune)Peacekeeping Forces Power Agenda (December 2, 2004)
EU peacekeeping force, EUFOR, has replaced NATO's SFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The EU has undertaken a "handful of modest military missions" in the past two years, but the mission in Bosnia is the "only real industrial-scale attempt to implement European security and defence policy on the ground." Observers say EUFOR's work in Bosnia represents a test for EU policy aimed at counterbalancing US military weight, including US influence through NATO. (Guardian)For US to Note, Europe Flexes Muscle in Afghanistan (September 22, 2004)
The EU presence in Afghanistan signals the beginnings of a European defense force distinct from NATO. Eurocorps took over NATO command in Afghanistan for six months beginning in August 2004, and the EU is set to take over peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina later in the year. The EU also played a broader peacekeeping role in 2003 in Macedonia and the Congo. Keeping in mind the recent reduction of US troops in Europe, some feel that the EU must be ready to act on its own. (New York Times)Flexing EU Muscles (September 15, 2004)
In this interview, British Defense Secretary Geoffrey Hoon discusses the development of EU battle groups to be used for rapid deployment, primarily at the UN's request. He outlines the necessity of troop contributions from larger EU nations to make the battle groups a viable source of increased military and political power in the international arena. The topic is up for discussion when EU defense ministers meet in September. (Radio Netherlands)UK to Join Rapid Reaction Force (February 11, 2004)
Britain, France and Germany have agreed on a new initiative for the creation of military battle groups capable of swift and prolonged deployments for conflict resolution and peacekeeping. Although the troops' mission is not confined to "failing states," it is likely that the groups would only be deployed "in limited, regional, crises in which the United States had no direct interest," says the Guardian.Greek Threat to EU Rapid Reaction Force (April 18, 2002)
To the European Union’s displeasure, Greece vetoed a proposed consultation with Turkey over the use of NATO’s military equipment for the EU's rapid reaction force. (Guardian)Frequenly Asked Questions about EU's Rapid Reaction Force (April 11, 2001)
The UK's Guardian's analysis on the EU's Rapid Reaction Force.Frequently Asked Questions about EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy
A detailed description of the mechanisms of the EU's common foreign, security, and defense policy.Organization for Security and Cooperatin in Europe (OSCE) Missions and Field Activities
Includes detailed information on OSCE's missions, monitorings, and assistance projects that are active in Kosovo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Caucasus, Central Asia and other regions.EU Ready to Field Rapid Reaction Force by 2003 (November 20, 2001)
Realizing its military and strategic ill-preparedness in the context of September 11th, the EU strengthened its commitment to establish the EU Rapid Reaction Force on time.(Irish Times)Development of Western European Union's Operational Capabilities
Eurocorps, the European joint army, and Euroforce, the European Rapid Deployment forces are some of the military units available to the Western European Union.The Militarisation of the European Union: A Civilisational Mistake (December 7, 2000)
The creation of an EU military force demonstrates that the EU is prioritizing regional militarism over multilateral peacekeeping. Even neutral Sweden is contributing 1500 troops to the EU force; there are currently only 192 UN Swedish peacekeepers. (Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research)EU to Create 5,000-Strong Police Force, Says Dutch Paper (June 15, 2000)
In addition to creating a 60,000-strong rapid intervention force, the European Union proposed a creation of 5,000-strong police force to undertake future international crises by the year 2003. (BBC /'De Standaard', Groot-Bijgaarden)Africa
Security Council Resolution 1809 on Regional Peacekeeping Operations (April 16, 2008)
The Security Council adopted Resolution 1809 at a high-level debate regarding the relationship between the United Nations and the African Union (AU). Noting the increased interaction between the AU and UN Security Council in peacekeeping, the resolution recommends that the AU continues to build its peacekeeping capacity, develops an early warning system in Africa to prevent conflict and establishes “a response capacity such as an African Standby Force.”Report of the Secretary General on the Relationship between the UN and Regional Organizations (April 7, 2008)
Ban Ki-moon recommends that the UN Security Council and the African Union (AU) improve their cooperation in matters of peace and security. AU peacekeeping missions have increased in number and autonomy, which has led to an overlap between the two organizations in peacekeeping operations. Ban suggests that the Council clarifies the legal relationship between the UN and regional organizations governing the use of force within international relations.Blue-Hatting Darfur (September 5, 2007)
The failure of the Peace Agreement among Darfur rebel groups in May 2006 made some international NGO’s and IDP’s question the capability and authority of the African Union Mission in Sudan to maintain peace in the region, in spite of previous successes. After the agreement fell through, Western countries cut their funding and support to the AU mission, and pushed for the establishment of a hybrid AU-UN force to “salvage” the situation. However, Mahmood Mamdani from Pambazuka argues that a UN mission without political solution will not promote peace in Darfur. On the contrary, he fears that without an existing cease-fire the peacekeeping mission will appear as a “military intervention”.Eager to Quell Its Own Conflicts, African Union Feels Overstretched (August 22, 2007)
Increasingly, countries such as Egypt, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Malawi, and Senegal contribute troops towards peacekeeping in Africa. Some analysts interpret this as a trend towards “African solutions to African problems.” But others, like Professor David Monyae, claim that rich countries selectively promote “African solutions” according to self-interest. They send money and equipment, and Africa sends bodies. (Christian Science Monitor)Don't Blame the AU (June 5, 2007)
The UN Security Council’s deliberations over sending peacekeeping forces to Darfur implicitly and unjustly shift blame for continued conflict in Darfur to the African Union. While it is true that the AU is overstretched, weakly mandated and under-funded, this Guardian article reports that AU commitment and flexibility successfully decreased levels of violence, improved Darfur’s humanitarian situation and increased confidence that the conflict might be resolved. The writer argues that the condescending UN Security Council attitude towards the AU results in diminished AMIS (African Union Mission in Sudan) morale and thereby jeopardizes future peace in Darfur and potentially Africa.UN Security Council Wants AU Strengthened (March 29, 2007)
The UN Security Council stresses the importance of a stronger partnership between the UN and the African Union (AU) in the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts in Africa. Hedi Annabi, Assistant Secretary General for Peacekeeping Operations, mentions in particular that the AU, whose member states provide over 75 percent of all UN peacekeepers in Africa and contribute 40 per cent of all troops in peacekeeping missions around the world, is an important source of regional knowledge and expertise. (Africast)Africa's New Standing Army Primed for Next Year (November 7, 2005)
The African Union hopes to establish the African Standby Force (ASF) by June 2006. Africa’s first-ever standing army would support UN peacekeeping missions and intervene militarily to prevent escalating conflicts on the continent. However, the ASF can only materialize with the financial and logistical support from non-African countries, mainly the US and the European Union. This presents a problem, as some believe that donor countries will use their monetary support as leverage for manipulating the ASF to serve their own interests. (Inter Press Service)A Continent in Crying Need of Peacekeepers (October 15, 2004)
The G-8 countries plan to train 75,000 African peacekeepers to work in the continent and possibly beyond. A recent study shows that peacekeeping offers "the best return on donor investment" compared with sanctions and development assistance. Although an African peacekeeping force is vital to building security in the region, this article by UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Marie Guéhenno cautions against ignoring other forms of intervention and calls for "reforming the security forces, supporting the rule of law and laying the foundations for economic growth" in African nations. (International Herald Tribune)UN Envoy Urges More African Peacekeepers in Sudan (September 27, 2004)
UN special envoy for Sudan Jan Pronk calls for a large-scale increase in African Union troops in Sudan with a broad mandate including protecting villages, staying in camps overnight, monitoring Sudanese police forces and supervising disarmament. Although militia attacks have lessened, sporadic clashes continue and people are still afraid. No countries outside of the African Union have pledged any troops to Sudan. (New York Times)Darfur Tests Africa's Ability to Police Itself (August 25, 2004)
The crisis in Darfur gives the African Union (AU) the opportunity to show it can play a significant peacekeeping role in Africa. The AU is in the process of creating a standby force of African peacekeepers capable of moving quickly into conflict zones. The AU has intervened militarily in Africa's conflicts once so far, with a small contingent of peacekeepers in Burundi. (Chicago Tribune)African Union to Send Troops to Darfur (July 5, 2004)
The African Union will send troops to Darfur to protect unarmed peace observers and monitor refugee camps and border regions between Sudan and Chad. Some analysts and diplomats view the mission as a “litmus test” in determining whether the African Union can fulfill its “self-imposed mandate to resolve conflicts in Africa.” (Reuters)An African Army, for Africans? (July 2, 2004)
The Peace and Security Council, the newest branch of the African Union, plans to create a standby force for responding efficiently to crises on the continent. But financial constraints could undermine the effectiveness of such a force, since most AU countries are not capable of contributing sufficient funds to the peacekeeping army. (Inter Press Service)Pan-African Grouping Launches Its Own Security Council (May 25, 2004)
Modeling on the UN Security Council, the African Union has established a new Peace and Security Council, which will assume the responsibility of maintaining stability in Africa, such as intervening in conflicts and preventing crimes against humanity from taking place. (Agence France Presse)Still Long Way to Go to End Africa's Internal Conflicts (May 17, 2004)
Recent conflicts in Africa, including Sudan and Northern Uganda, have raised concern over the effectiveness of the African Union's conflict-resolution initiatives and the adequacy of attention by regional powers to low-profile, intra-state violence. (Business Day)African Leaders Sign Common Security Plan (February 28, 2004)
African leaders have signed a groundbreaking defense and security agreement that enables the African Union (AU) to send forces on short notice to intervene in wars and conflicts across the continent. The head of the Rwandan delegation, however, maintained that "there has to be will" on the part of the nations involved to help the countries in conflict, if the agreement is to have any significance. (Associated Press)African Summit to Adopt Security, Defense Policy (February 6, 2004)
The African Union (AU) is holding a landmark summit on the adoption of a common security and defense policy. With security still being the greatest impediment to the continent's economic development, such a policy will strengthen Africa's capacity for peacekeeping and possibly revive its economy in the future. (Reuters)South African Leader Sees Progress in Burundi (December 5, 2003)
South Africa's deputy president informed the Security Council about the progress of the regional African mission that maintains peace in Burundi. The Council has not yet decided if a UN peacekeeping mission will supplant the 2,650-strong African mission force. (Associated Press)African Ministers Agree on Robust Peacekeeping Force (July 1, 2002)
Foreign Ministers of states, members of the Organization for African Unity, agreed that the new African Union should support a multinational stand-by peacekeeping force. A new body, called the Peace and Security Council, will regulate the intervention in member-states’ internal affairs in cases of genocide and crimes against humanity. (Agence France Presse)Peace And Security Dimensions Of the African Union (March 1, 2002)
The UN Economic Commission For Africa explores ways of developing a common “security community” in Africa. Linking security at the regional and the national level and utilizing the existing framework of regional and sub-regional organizations is key.France Promotes Southern Africa Peacekeeping Force (May 8, 2001)
France expands its initiative to encourage all African countries to provide peacekeepers for missions in the continent, not just former colonies. (Reuters)ECOWAS, UN Continue Talks on Regional Security (March 10, 2001)
Since ECOWAS intervention in Liberia and Sierra Leone, the UN and ECOWAS have strengthened their cooperation on economic, social, political and security issues affecting the sub-region.West Africa Goes on Discussing Regional Rapid Reaction Force (July 20, 2000)
Africa wants to take its problems in its own hands as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is proposing a rapid reaction force deployable in regional conflicts. (Xinhua News Agency)Other
Arab League Credibility Depends on Resolving Darfur Crisis (May 25, 2004)
This Daily Star article argues that a reform of the Arab League will be nothing more than rhetoric if the League fails to "demonstrate an ability to play a meaningful role…in Arab world politics." The League should show concern for regional problems and assume responsibility for tackling regional crises, including the latest conflict in Darfur.UN Welcomes ASEAN Peacekeeping Force, Promises Help (February 27, 2004)
The United Nations welcomed Indonesia's proposal to create an ASEAN peacekeeping force. The Indonesian Minister of Foreign Affairs reasoned that such a regional force was essential because "most conflicts in the world today are not between states but within states, and internal strife has a way of spilling over from the embattled country to the rest of the region." (Jakarta Post)Peacemaking too Important to Be Left to the US (February 23, 2002)
The trend of US amassing unparalleled military power is creating a world where “the US fights, the UN feeds and the EU funds.” However, European officials are wary of giving the US a “carte blanch” for its military operations. (Irish Times )Commonwealth of Independent States: Collective Security Treaty Members Meet Over Afghanistan, Terrorism(November 29, 2001)
Collective Security Treaty members discussed how to better coordinate their foreign policy decisions and military and technical cooperation as the treaty is key to "guaranteeing security and stability in the post-Soviet world," and countering the threat of Islamic extremist groups in Central Asia. (Center for Defense Information )Endgame Afghanistan; Only a Muslim UN Force can Secure Peace (October 14, 2001)
Because “no Western force would be either useful or acceptable to a majority of Afghans”, peacekeepers should be recruited from Muslim countries and operate under the auspices of the Organization of Islamic Conference and the UN. (Independent).Preparations for French-led African Peacekeeping Exercises Complete (September 21, 2001)
More than 25 countries will participate in the multinational peacekeeping exercises under France’s Reinforce African Peacekeeping Capacities (RECAMP) project.( Agence France Presse).Reinforcement of African Peacekeeping Capacities (RECAMP)
RECAMP, a joint action of France’s Defense and Foreign Ministries, aims to strengthen African countries’ capacities to maintain security on the African continent.
More Information on Regional Organizations
More Information on UN Peacekeeping
