Global Policy Forum

Egypt is Skeptical About US Program to Foster Democracy

Print

By Clifford Krauss

New York Times
December 18, 2002


When Secretary of State Colin Powell presented a new program last week to build democratic institutions and fight poverty in Arab countries with $29 million in fresh annual aid, the reaction from Egypt was about as welcoming as a hot gust of wind in the desert.

An article in Al Akhbar, the government-owned daily, dismissed the bid to improve America's image in the region, "given that it lacks honesty, justice and transparency." The article said the plan "confirmed the belief long upheld in the region of how Israel currently controls the decision-making process in the U.S."

Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher was somewhat more diplomatic, saying that "it does not touch on the basic problem which is the cause of the other problems, and that is the lack of a Middle East settlement."

Egypt remains Washington's strongest ally in the Arab world, but the two countries appear exceptionally out of step at the very moment the Bush administration is preparing for a possible invasion of Iraq.

President Hosni Mubarak has made his position clear for months that an attack on Iraq could let loose a virulently radical backlash across a region already incensed by the Israeli crackdown in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

That is not an unusual stance in the Arab world, but it comes in stark contrast to Egypt's position preparing for and fighting the first Gulf War a little over a decade ago. After Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, Egypt persuaded several Arab countries, including Syria, to join the American-led coalition and contributed 36,000 ground troops.

Egypt was handsomely rewarded for its role in the war, with Western creditors forgiving two-thirds of the nation's debt, which in turn led to an opening of the Egyptian economy, higher growth rates and the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs in the mid-1990s.

The Egyptian economy - now sputtering because of a loss of tourism revenue and lower tolls on the Suez Canal, among other reasons - could use another boost. But Egyptian officials say the prospect of increased Western help would not be worth the risk of going to war again.

Egypt strongly supports United Nations Security Council resolutions calling for Iraqi disarmament and vigorous examinations by weapons inspectors of suspected Iraqi armament plants. But Egypt has made it abundantly clear that it will not contribute troops or active military support to a second Gulf war.

Officials here note that the Suez Canal remains open to American warships moving into the Gulf, but they refused to pledge that Egyptian waters and airspace will remain open to U.S. military operations if a prolonged war produces a heated reaction against the United States and its allies in the region.

"There is a difference between then and now," said Nabil Osman, the government spokesman, "because then there was an Arab country invaded, occupied, swallowed and erased from the map overnight."

With a population of 70 million, Egypt remains the intellectual, cultural and political capital of the Arab world. As an ally of the United States that has received $2 billion in annual aid from Washington since it made peace with Israel in the 1970s, Egypt continues to be a bridge between the rest of the Arab world and the West.

It is a balancing act that is particularly delicate at this juncture. Mubarak has not talked to President Saddam Hussein of Iraq in more than a decade, according to his aides, but his emissaries helped persuade Saddam to allow the United Nations weapons inspectors back into his country.

Now Egypt is pressing the United States to give the inspectors enough time to do their work, even if that puts off an attack indefinitely. "If America wishes to keep its credibility in the area, an unjustified war should not be in the cards," Osman said in an interview.


More Information on International Aid
More Information on the Threat of US War Against Iraq

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.