Monitoring Policy Making at the United Nations |
| ||||||||||||
Energy Taxes
Picture Credit: MosNews.com Emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide cause the earth’s atmosphere to warm, leading to deadly droughts, floods and other extreme weather events. Taxes on carbon/energy can help mitigate global climate change, by raising the prices of carbon-rich fuels to reflect the social and environmental costs they inflict on society. Higher prices of carbon-based fuels would also boost the use of renewable energy, such as solar and wind power.
Many experts argue that energy taxes would be more efficient in reducing the speed of global warming than the current emissions trading system under the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto system imposes greenhouse gas emission caps on ratifying countries by giving them a limited amount of emissions credits. But these emissions credits are tradable, thereby allowing affluent governments and powerful industries to evade responsibility by purchasing credits from less-polluting countries and industries. Critics argue that the emissions trading system only deals with climate change on a superficial level. Moreover, energy taxes have the advantage of raising revenues that could be earmarked for further investment in renewable energy sources.
Also See GPF's Pages on:
Global Taxes | The Environment
Articles and Documents
2008 |2007 |2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | Archived Articles
Carbon Taxes vs. Emissions Trading (April 17, 1998)
Analysis by Kevin Baumert of the differences and merits of each mechanism.
Princeton Department of Economics graph demonstrating use of a carbon tax as an efficient regulating mechanism for reducing carbon emissions.
Excerpt from a Foreign Affairs article by Richard Cooper of Harvard University.2008
Why Cap and Trade Could Backfire (July 16, 2008)
Proponents of the cap-and-trade system argue that capping carbon emissions reduces output and in turn decreases global warming. But, by turning carbon emissions into tradable commodities, the cap-and-trade system removes the negative “stigma” associated with producing such emissions. The system suggests that one can produce carbon emissions as long as one pays to “neutralize” the carbon footprint. Further, this Christian Science Monitor article says, the system has not reduced global warming. Carbon emissions in Europe rose by 0.8 percent, after the first year of the EU’s cap-and-trade system.The Trouble with Markets for Carbon (June 20, 2008)
In 2005, the EU established a market-based system to cut carbon emissions that allows companies to buy and sell carbon emission permits. But, environmentalists argue that European governments have provided too many permits to certain polluters. And, evidence from the European Environment Agency suggests that carbon emissions from participating industries rose by 0.7 percent in 2007. The US is likely to experience many of the same challenges faced by the EU because US policymakers have proposed a weak cap-and-trade system. (New York Times)Plan B - How to Stop Global Warming (January 4, 2008)
In his book – Plan B 3.0 – the President of the Earth Policy Institute Lester Brown outlines “an all-out response proportionate to the threat that global warming presents to our future.” One element of Brown’s plan involves a “worldwide carbon tax,” modeled after cigarette taxes. This article points out that Brown’s proposals make use of existing technologies, suggesting that the “real battle over climate change is now political, not technological.” (Time)2007
Global Carbon Tax Urged at UN Climate Conference (December 13, 2007)
A panel of UN participants at the Climate Conference in Bali urged the implementation of carbon taxes to reduce global warming. They argue that such a tax would represent a fair system, allowing and encouraging all countries to share the burden of climate change. According to the panelists, the revenues from the tax should go to a Multilateral Adaptation Fund that will help countries deal with global warming. (Canada Free Press)Carbon Tax Should Replace Carbon Trading to Curb Climate Change, Says US Mayor Bloomberg (December 13, 2007)
At the UN climate conference in Bali, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg strongly advocated for carbon taxes rather than cap-and-trade schemes as a means to reduce carbon emissions. Bloomberg said carbon trading is “vulnerable to special interests, corruption, inefficiencies.” A carbon tax would more directly and efficiently reduce carbon emissions that cause global warming, as well as provide the world’s governments with funds to further improve the environment. (Associated Press)Carbon-Taxing the Rich (December 7, 2007)
Former World Bank economist Joseph Stiglitz argues that all countries generating carbon emissions must pay the cost of reducing climate change. He suggests governments increase the use of trade sanctions to punish free riders, and that governments must use every single available instrument to stop global warming. The simplest and most effective tool argues Stiglitz, is a carbon tax, which would apply directly to the emitters and secure a fair system for both rich and poor countries. (Guardian)A Tax on Carbon to Cool the Planet (October 26, 2007)
A carbon tax would force consumers to pay the real social and environmental cost of burning fuels and raise the incentives to invest in renewable energy sources. But the US Congress remains skeptical and has instead proposed to lower carbon emissions through cap-and-trade plans. The author of this Christian Science Monitor article argues that cap-and-trade schemes in other countries have been flawed and therefore the US should set a good example by taxing fossil fuels.Time to Tax the Carbon Dodgers (April 5, 2007)
This BBC commentary calls for a tax on exports from wealthy countries – such as the US and Australia – that have refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol. The author argues that the tax would encourage these governments to “develop responsible climate policies” and could “redress the balance” of production costs between countries that pay for their CO2 emissions and those that “won’t take climate change seriously.”Poll Finds Strong Support in Europe and US for Polluter Taxes (February 23, 2007)
An International Herald Tribune and France 24 poll found that the majority of US and European residents agreed that politicians were failing “to address the challenge of global warming.” Respondents overwhelmingly supported a tax on industrial pollution and called for “responsibility for global warming to bear a financial consequence.” Environmentalists hailed the results as a step forward in combating climate change, and urged governments to take action in response to public opinion.2006
French Plan Would Tax Imports from Non-Signers of Kyoto Pact (November 13, 2006)
As the world’s two largest greenhouse gas emitters, the US and China, still prove unwilling to join the Kyoto protocol by the second week of the November 2006 UN Climate Conference in Nairobi, French Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin suggests a new means of pressuring disinclined nations. Arguing that Europe must “use all its weight to stand up” to “environmental dumping,” Villepin proposes a punitive carbon tax on imports from countries that refuse to commit themselves to emission targets after 2012. The French prime minister says he would like to study such a tax with his European partners, and that France will “make concrete proposals about how such a tax might work in the first quarter of 2007.” (Reuters)Climate Change: Time to Get Real (September 26, 2006)
Climate change will hit the poorest first and worst, and “divide rather than unite nations,” this openDemocracy article argues. It thereby threatens both prosperity and security and in fact “is the most serious threat to humanity since the invention of nuclear weapons.” Allowing the world economy to keep growing and avoiding catastrophic climate change requires a very rapid expansion of energy efficiency and use of renewables. With a relatively small carbon tax, “this will be easier than many think,” and campaigners now need to leverage public awareness to concrete recommendations for government action.2005
New Zealand First to Levy Carbon Tax (May 5, 2005)
New Zealand has become the first country in the world to introduce a tax on carbon emissions. By making polluting energy sources such as coal and oil more expensive than cleaner ones, New Zealand intends to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming. The government says the new tax will also have a beneficial impact on the economy in the long run, as timely action will make it easier for New Zealand to comply with stricter norms in the future. (Guardian)2004
Green Taxes 'to hit poor hardest' (October 27, 2004)
A paper from Policy Study Institute raises concerns that green taxes could affect lower income households disproportionately. However, the study remains positive towards green taxes, stating that governments can design tariffs or target compensation through state benefits to remediate negative social consequences. (Guardian)US Told Tax Can Control Warming (May 31, 2004)
At the “Copenhagen Consensus” global economics conference, three prominent economists argue that a US carbon tax would be the most efficient means to decrease greenhouse gas emissions and curb climate change. (Denver Post)2003
New Energy Taxes for Europe (October 28, 2003)
European governments have adopted an energy taxation law aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, this law exempts consumer petrol prices and, public and international air transport from the "energy tax." (EU Politix)Energy Taxes of the Rich and Famous (January 9, 2003)
Most luxury homes in Aspen, Colorado contain energy-guzzling amenities such as heated driveways and outdoor pools. In response, Pitkin County has implemented the world’s stiffest tax on carbon emissions, rated at $340 per ton of carbon dioxide, as part of a plan to finance green projects in the region. (Christian Science Monitor)2002
New Zealand Plans Carbon Tax to Meet Kyoto Targets (October 18, 2002)
The New Zealand government plans to introduce a tax of NZ$25 per ton of produced carbon dioxide by 2007, which will increase fuel costs for consumers. The new "carbon tax" will help the country meet its greenhouse gas emission targets under the Kyoto climate change agreement. (Planet Ark)2001
Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries: Issues And Strategies (2001)
This OECD report analyses the use and effectiveness of environmentally related taxes in member counties. It also discuss problems to broader use of these taxes as well as potential solutions.Can the Financing Gap Be Closed? (December, 2001)
This article discusses the findings of the “Zedillo Report." The report stresses the need for a global system of taxation, based on the consumption of fossil fuels and on international currency transactions. It also suggest the creation of a new international tax organization and a global council. (Africa Recovery)Setback for Brown over European Tax (April 21, 2001)
The 15 EU governments have agreed to reopen talks on how to levy an EU-wide energy tax. The move was opposed by Britain who argued that the tax would undermine the competitiveness of European companies. (Daily Mail)World's Richest Nations Urge Green Taxes (April 9, 2001)
The OECD is urging the removal of subsidies and introduction of green taxes "to prevent irreversible damage to our environment over the next 20 years". (Environment News Service)Swedish Presidency Tries a Different Tack on Energy Taxation (March 31, 2001)
The Swedish Presidency has turned its attention to the issue of energy tax, which has been in deadlock at Council level over the last few Presidencies. (Europe Information Service)2000
'Radical' Irish Plan to Reduce Greenhouse Gas (November 2, 2000)
The Irish government sets out a strategy to “decouple economic growth from the growth in greenhouse gas emissions” including the phasing-in of carbon taxes. (Irish Times)More Taxes, Please: Why the Price of Gas is Too Low (November 1, 2000)
Even the CEO Annual of the Canadian National Post Business Magazine is calling for higher fuel taxes. Christian Zimmerman presents a variety of arguments for energy taxes, including the fact that economies with higher fuel taxes are less vulnerable to oil price ‘shocks’.Shifting Ground: A CCPA-BC Policy Brief on the Potential and Limitations of Environmental Tax Shifting (October, 2000)
This policy brief warns that tax shifting from societal "goods" (ie. income and employment) to "bads" (ie. pollution and resource depletion) cannot serve as a substitute of strong regulations. (Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives)UK Needs Carbon Tax Not Energy Tax (June 16, 2000)
The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution wants a 60% cut in carbon dioxide emissions over the next 50 years. The Commission argues that government’s proposals for an energy tax should be an intermediate stage in the introduction of a carbon tax. (Chemical News & Intelligence)Heat Is On To Reduce Greenhouse Gases (March 31, 2000)
“There may be a role for an energy tax but only as part of a wider package of environmental measures,” reports the Irish Times. Greenhouse gas emissions need to be reduced, but with the least expense to national economies.German Ecotaxes Cause Political Backlash (January 11, 2000)
Germany's main opposition party, the CDU/CSU, has launched a campaign against the government's ecotax policy, alleging that revenue raised from this tax was not going contributions as promised. (Ends Daily)
