Global Policy Forum

Financial Secrecy Index 2013

TJN_Logo_OCT-2013Tax Justice Network today launches its third edition of the Financial Secrecy Index. The index ranks countries according to their harmfulness to the world's financial systems in terms of secrecy. It shows where the most damaging jurisdiction in the world are to be found. These jurisdictions provide the necessary framework for money laundering, tax avoidance and evasion and capital flight. These practices are detrimental to the budgets of every country, not least to those of countries in the Global South. The index highlights not only the problems, but also solutions that can be derived from the analysis.





November 7, 2013 | Tax Justice Network

New index reveals UK runs biggest part of global secrecy network 

TJN’s 2013 Financial Secrecy Index exposes yawning gap between G20 rhetoric and reality

Today the Tax Justice Network launches its 2013 Financial Secrecy Index, the biggest ever survey of global financial secrecy. This unique index combines a secrecy score with a weighting to create a ranking of the countries that most actively and aggressively promote secrecy in global finance.

Click here: Financial Secrecy Index.

This new edition of the Financial Secrecy Index shows that the United Kingdom is the most important global player in the financial secrecy world. While the UK itself ranks only in 21st place, it supports and partly controls a web of secrecy jurisdictions around the world, from Cayman and Bermuda to Jersey and Gibraltar. Had TJN aggregated the entire British network it would easily top the index, far above Switzerland. (Explore the British Connection here.)

Claims in September by British Prime Minister David Cameron that the UK havens are no longer a concern are baseless: our research demonstrates that while the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and some other British jurisdictions have recently curbed some secrecy offerings, others have expanded theirs. (See also the full narrative reports on the Cayman Islands, on Jersey and on the British Virgin Islands.)

The index, now expanded to cover 82 jurisdictions, also reveals how broader claims by the G20 and leading powers to have cracked down effectively on tax havens are bogus. While some welcome promises have been made and modest improvements seen, governments remain light years away from seeing the transformative changes the world so urgently needs.

The index reveals that overall, financial secrecy remains alive and well.

The top ten secrecy jurisdictions 

Switzerland retains a fully deserved top place, unchanged from 2011. While it has made some concessions on financial secrecy, particularly to the U.S., these changes only pierce Swiss secrecy in narrow, limited ways. Switzerland has also been playing the spoiler, striving to block or derail emerging international transparency initiatives. Although Switzerland has signed more treaties allowing information exchange under the weak on request model, it has often extracted painful concessions in exchange. Switzerland has, however, recently signed the Multilateral Tax Convention which, if ratified, would improve its secrecy score in future. (See more in our full Swiss report here.)

Luxembourg is the dark horse of the offshore secrecy world. Offering a toxic cocktail of secrecy, tax loopholes and lax financial regulation, it is serviced by a huge offshore financial services industry and has recently been working with Switzerland to derail emerging European transparency initiatives. Its membership of the European Union keeps it off many tax haven blacklists and gives it a potent lobbying position in the world’s biggest single economic bloc. It has made some improvements, however, as our Luxembourg report explains.

Hong Kong and Singapore, two rival fast-emerging Asian secrecy jurisdictions, have risen up our index, above all because of the rapid growth of their offshore industries. This expansion is principally due to economic growth in Asia, plus the displacement of some European and North American offshore activity eastwards, and the trend has happened in spite of welcome recent efforts by Singapore in particular to curb the full extent of its secrecy offerings. Both jurisdictions still have high secrecy scores, however. (See here how Singapore and Hong Kong became secrecy jurisdictions, and what they provide.)

The Cayman Islands, part of the British network, has improved its secrecy score measurably after making some welcome moves on financial transparency. Significantly, its market share has risen even as its secrecy score has improved. Even so, Cayman remains a highly secretive jurisdiction where you can go to prison not just for revealing confidential information, but merely for asking for it, as our Cayman report notes.

The United States, in sixth place on our index, remains a highly important secrecy jurisdiction, offering secrecy both at a Federal level and on the level of individual states. The U.S. has recently taken welcome action to protect itself against offshore secrecy, notably through its FATCA information-sharing project and its crackdown on Swiss bankers. But it has proven far less willing to reciprocate: reformers battling to curb the U.S.’ role as a secrecy jurisdiction have been facing immense resistance. (Click here to see our narrative report on the history and current role of the U.S. as a secrecy jurisdiction.)

Lebanon is a surprise newcomer to our top ten, having risen from 22nd place in our last index to seventh place in 2013.  This change is because of a dramatic growth in Lebanon’s scale weighting, based on IMF data. The IMF has told us that this change is the fruit of improved and more comprehensive data collection. Although Lebanon’s share of offshore financial services is small by world standards, its secrecy score of 79 is very high, giving it a deservedly elevated position in our index. One to watch. (Click here to see our report on Lebanon.)

Jersey has improved its secrecy score, buoyed by its participation in a rising tide of jurisdictions signing new international tax agreements that allow for some information exchange. Yet Jersey’s secrecy score of 75 remains high by international standards, most importantly with respect to its unregistered offshore trusts and foundations. (See our Jersey report for more information.)

Germany and Japan are two other potentially surprising members of the top ten. Nevertheless, media stories and other sources indicate that these jurisdictions both host large illicit assets from other countries in conditions of secrecy. Germany’s and Japan’s secrecy scores of 59 and 61 respectively are comparable to the United States’ score of 58, but they are ranked below the U.S. because their international financial services industries are smaller.  (Our reports on Germany and on Japan explore these jurisdictions in more detail.)

Why has my country ranking changed since 2011?


The 2013 Financial Secrecy Index ranking differs from the 2011 index. We have added nine new jurisdictions and slightly modified our methodology (see here). So the two rankings are not directly comparable: a better comparison would involve looking at how an individual country’s secrecy score has changed. See our secrecy scores explained here, and see the 2011 secrecy scores here



 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.