Global Policy Forum

Melinda Gates to address the World Health Assembly: Civil Society registers its protest

twnMelinda Gates, Co-Chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, addressed as a keynote speaker the 67th World Health Assembly on May 20, 2014. Civil Society Organizations like the Peoples' Health Movement and Third World Network express their strong protest against the decision of the World Health Organisation (WHO) to invite her. According to  undersigned organizations, inter alia Ms. Gates’ credentials as a leader in public health are unclear. In addition, more worth knowing is that the private organization, which is the second largest funder of the WHO, invested their corporate stock endowment in industries like oil or food, which are clearly conflicting with global health.





May 21, 2014 ǀ Third World Network

WN Info Service on Health Issues (May14/03)
21 May 2014
Third World Network

Melinda Gates addresses the World Health Assembly: Civil Society registers its protest 

We the undersigned organizations express our strong protest against the decision of the World Health Organisation (WHO) to invite Melinda Gates (of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – BMGF) as the keynote speaker at the 67th World Health Assembly, that begun in Geneva on 19th May. This is the third time in the last 10 years that someone from the BMGF and of the family has been an invited speaker at the WHA (Melinda Gates was preceded by her husband Bill Gates, in 2005 and 2011). Ms. Melinda Gates’ credentials as a leader in public health are unclear.

It is unacceptable that the WHO, supposedly governed by sovereign nation states, should countenance that at its annual global conference, the keynote address would be delivered thrice in ten years by individuals from the same private organization, and from the same family.

The BMGF is the second largest funder of the WHO. It has come to occupy this place over the past two decades, because of the freeze on assessed contributions by member states. Currently, 80% of WHO’s finances come from voluntary contributions (including from countries and from private sources) and BMGF’s funding is ‘tied’ to projects that the foundation has an interest in funding.

BMGF’s munificence towards the WHO as well as towards many other global health causes is well known. Less well known is the Foundation’s investment policies that are clearly in conflict with global health.

BMGF’s policies and practices are in conflict with global health

Despite the strong influence the BMGF exerts on global health policies, the effect of the policies it promotes has never been evaluated. This lack of accountability is based on the false premise that private foundations are not publicly accountable. This overlooks the fact that these foundations intervene in public life through political power they exert as a result of their financial clout; are publicly subsidized through tax exemptions; and reinforce the notion that inequity can be addressed through charity.

The Foundation’s corporate stock endowment is heavily invested in food industry (many of them under scrutiny for promoting unhealthy lifestyles), directly and indirectly. The Foundation holds significant shares in McDonald’s (10 million shares -- about 4% of the Gates’ portfolio), and Coca-Cola (0.34 million shares, 14% of the Foundation’s portfolio).

Previously it invested heavily in pharmaceutical companies. In 2009 it sold extensive pharmaceutical holdings in Johnson & Johnson (2.5 million shares), Schering-Plough Corporation (14.9 million shares), Eli Lilly and Company (about 1 million shares), Merck & Co. (8.1 million shares), and Wyeth (3.7 million shares)[i][ii]. Several people associated with the Foundation are currently or were previously members of the boards or executive branches of several major food and pharmaceutical companies, including Coca-Cola, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, General Mills and Kraft[iii].

The blurring of the boundaries between the Foundation’s objectives and its portfolio investment is evident in Foundation grants that encourage communities in developing countries to become business affiliates of Coca-Cola, in which the Foundation has substantial holdings. The Foundationheld stock in Merck at a time when it developed partnerships with the African Comprehensive AIDS and Malaria Partnership and the Merck Company Foundation to test Merck products.

CSOs Demands Accountability from WHO

It is not possible, given the numerous conflict of interest issues that are at stake, to view the invitation to Ms. Melinda Gates as a routine move. It would appear that the WHO Secretariat is more beholden to private donors than to the member states, that it is constitutionally mandated to serve.

We demands that:

  • The WHO to draw up a transparent mechanism for inviting speakers to the WHA in future.
  • The WHO clarify the criteria based on which Melinda Gates has been invited to speak at the WHA.

We also urge Member States to take the lead in developing transparent and clear norms regarding such issues, and not leave the same to the discretion of the Secretariat.

Sd/-                                                                 sd/-

Peoples’ Health Movement                           Third World Network

Sd/-                                                                 sd/-

Wemos (Netherlands)                                    Health Innovation in Practice (Geneva)

Sd/-    

International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN)


[i] http://www.nasdaq.com/quotes/institutional-portfolio/bill--melinda-gates-foundation-trust-98131

[ii] DAVID STUCKLER, SANJAY BASU & MCKEE., M. (2011) Global Health Philanthropy and Institutional Relationships: How Should Conflicts of Interest Be Addressed? PLoS Medicine, 8

[iii] ibid

Source: Third World Network

To watch Melinda Gates' speech, please look here.

More information about the World Health Assembly: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/events/2014/wha67/en/
 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.