Global Policy Forum

Ethiopia and Eritrea Now at Odds

Print

By Marc Lacey

New York Times
April 14, 2002

Ethiopia claimed victory today in its border dispute with Eritrea after an independent tribunal at The Hague handed down a ruling. But the ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration was not made public, and Eritrea branded Ethiopia's claims as lies.


The two countries went to war in 1998 over the placement of the 620-mile border. The conflict, which went on for two years, left as many as 80,000 people dead.

The five-member court delivered the ruling to the two governments this morning but officials agreed to delay public disclosure of the decision until Monday. That did not stop both sides from trying to put a positive spin on the long-awaited ruling, which is expected to have significant political repercussions in the two countries.

The leaders of both have said they will abide by the decision by the panel of experts, although both President Isaias Afewerki of Eritrea and Prime Minister Meles Zenawi of Ethiopia will probably face criticism at home if they are seen as losing significant ground.

Some of Mr. Zenawi's domestic critics blame him for allowing Ethiopia to give up Eritrea, which was once an Ethiopian province, in the first place.

Mr. Afewerki has cracked down on political opponents over the last year, including some who criticized the war.

Once an Italian colony, Eritrea was annexed by Emperor Haile Selasse as Ethiopia's northernmost province in 1962. But guerrillas from both Eritrea and Ethiopia teamed up in 1991 to defeat the emperor's successor, Mengistu Haile Mariam. Two years later, Eritrea became an independent nation in a peaceful deal.

But Eritrea's border with its southern neighbor was never defined, and a series of economic and land disputes between the two countries broke out in 1997. Full-fledged war was declared in 1998 after Ethiopia accused Eritrea of invading the border town of Badme.

Eventually, after heavy casualties on both sides in what amounted to trench warfare, Ethiopia won a string of military victories in which its troops moved deep into Eritrean territory. The two governments agreed to lay down their arms only on the arrival of an international peacekeeping force. Another major aspect of the cease-fire agreement was the border ruling.

Today, Ethiopia's foreign minister, Seyoum Mesfin, called a news conference in Addis Ababa to claim that the decision swings heavily in Ethiopia's favor.

"This is a victory of peace over aggression and violence," said Mr. Mesfin, who signed the cease-fire agreement with his Eritrean counterpart in Algiers in June 2000. "It is a victory of law over the rule of the jungle." Mr. Mesfin, who had reviewed the ruling, said that Ethiopia had been granted possession of a string of disputed villages, from Zalamebessa and Bure to the west to Badme to the east.

Badme, a small town largely overlooked by both countries before the war, has taken on symbolic importance as the site of the first battle. Officials who had seen the ruling were quoted by news agencies as saying that Eritrea received some disputed land to the west of Badme. "Ethiopia accepts the ruling," the foreign minister said. "Ethiopia is satisfied. We hope that the decision will once and for all seal any attempt by military adventurers to change the boundary by means of force."

But the Eritrean government, without going into detail, disputed Ethiopia's claims. During the half-time break in a soccer match today, Eritrean state television said that "whatever the Ethiopian government has announced is a lie." The television showed a map of the border but gave no indication of the specifics of the border ruling.

Tensions between the two countries remain so high that the United Nations peacekeepers now patrolling a 15-mile-wide security zone along the disputed border went on a heightened state of alert before today's decision.

The United Nations secretary general, Kofi Annan, has urged the two countries to accept the ruling as a milestone in the process toward peace. "Once the commission's decision is known, it is imperative that the two countries implement it without delay," Mr. Annan said in a joint statement with Amara Essy, secretary general of the Organization of African Unity.

In fact, the border decision is just one step in the peace efforts. The United Nations force intends to stay until after experts begin marking the new border on the ground, a task complicated by the tens of thousands of land mines laid by the rival militaries.


More Information on the Peace Process

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C íŸ 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.