Global Policy Forum

BCI 2011: Economic Growth Does Not Ensure Human Well-Being

Social Watch’s “Basic Capabilities Index” (BCI) measures poverty based on only three basic social indicators: for health, nutrition and education (monetary income is not an indicator). The BCI has proved to be highly correlated with the measure of many other human capabilities and therefore works as a “summary-index” for progress in social development. The 2011 BCI report shows that despite the fact that global trade and average per capita income have grown faster in the 21st century than in the decades before, progress in poverty reduction has slowed down. In fact, the report argues that the last decade was “a lost decade in the fight against poverty.”

October 17, 2011

Far from improving the quality of life of the world population, increased trade and per capita income have not resulted in reduced poverty, according to the most recent Basic Capabilities Index (BCI) published by Social Watch, an international network of civil society organizations.

The index was launched on Friday 14, in the Netherlands, on the eve of the international days against hunger and poverty. October 16 commemorates the creation of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and October 17 is international poverty day.

Global trade and average per capita income have grown faster in the first decade of the 21st century than the decades before, but progress against poverty slowed down. World exports multiplied almost five times between 1990 and 2010 and income more than doubled, but the world average BCI only increased by one tenth in those same 20 years.

Macroeconomic performance and human well-being do not go hand in hand, concludes Roberto Bissio, coordinator of Social Watch.

The countries where the social situation is most critical are Chad, Sierra Leone, Niger, Somalia and Guinea Bissau, all of them in Africa. Afghanistan was the worse positioned ten years ago, but there are no reliable data to compute its BCI in 2011.

The index “shows that the last decade was a lost decade in the fight against poverty, in spite of the excellent performance of emerging economies,” commented Bissio. The gap between the slow progress in social indicators and the rapid growth of world trade and per capita income is explained “by growing inequalities in distributing the benefits of economic prosperity,” he added.

The BCI is based on key indicators that measure essential aspects of survival and human dignity: mortality among children under five, reproductive health (measured by births attended by skilled personnel), and primary education (school enrolment, proportion of children reaching fifth grade and adult literacy rate).

The available figures do not allow to assess the whole impact of the crisis that started in 2008, because social indicators are gathered and published much slower than the economic numbers. Yet, Social Watch member organizations have already verified in their countries that the most vulnerable sectors of the population are the ones carrying the largest burden of the crisis.

Before the crisis, gross income was growing fast while progress in education, health and nutrition was already too slow. If industrialized countries enter into a prolonged period of stagnation or recession, the situation of the most vulnerable sectors at global level can only become worse.

Find the Basic Capabilties Index 2011 here .


FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.