Global Policy Forum

Big Powers Study Iran's Reply

Print

By Crispian Balmer

Reuters
August 23, 2006

World powers are ready to respond to Iran's call for talks over its nuclear ambitions but only if it first suspends uranium enrichment, France said on Wednesday. Iran handed over its response to an incentives package offered by six nations on Tuesday, saying it offered ideas that would allow serious talks to start immediately. The West has in the past said such calls for talks were a stalling tactic.


"As we have always said ... a return to the negotiating table is tied to the suspension of uranium enrichment," French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy told a news conference. There has been no sign Tehran agrees to this precondition, which it has previously dismissed as unacceptable.

The U.N. Security Council has warned Iran could face possible sanctions if it does not meet an August 31 deadline to freeze enrichment, a process that can be used to make fuel for nuclear power plants or material for warheads. The five permanent U.N. Security Council members Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States, plus Germany offered Iran economic and other incentives to stop enrichment. So far, they have not given their verdict on Iran's reply.

One EU diplomat earlier said Iran had ruled out halting enrichment before talks in the 21-page reply "but indicated that it might be open to accept suspension in the course of negotiations". The Washington Post quoted unidentified officials from countries involved saying Iran was willing to consider halting its atomic program but not as a precondition for negotiations.

"In the reply, although (the West) has taken destructive measures, Iran has tried to create new opportunities for resolving the issue," senior Iranian nuclear official Ali Hosseinitash told Iran's official IRNA news agency.

Douste-Blazy described the reply as "a very long, complex document" and said the six powers would decide in a few days what to do in the Security Council. European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who delivered the offer to Iran in June, said the reply "requires a detailed and careful analysis". The White House said on Tuesday President Bush had yet to examine the reply. The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, said Washington was ready to move quickly on a resolution seeking sanctions if Tehran rejected the offer.

Answers Needed

Analysts say Iran's answer was probably designed to divide Security Council members Russia and China, both key trade partners of Tehran, from the United States, France and Britain which have backed tougher sanctions. A Chinese Foreign Ministry statement urged Iran to consider international concerns and take "constructive steps". "We also hope that other parties remain patient and calm," it added. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin was quoted by Interfax news agency as saying: "Russia will continue with the idea of seeking a political, negotiated settlement concerning Iran's nuclear program."

The world's fourth-largest oil exporter, Iran says it will not abandon uranium enrichment for peaceful means, which it says is its right under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Western diplomats say Iran has that right only once it has proved it is not seeking to make atomic bombs.

Oil prices, which have surged to record highs in recent months partly on tensions over the atomic standoff, fell below $73 a barrel on Wednesday. Traders said Iranian intransigence was factored into the market.

The nuclear package offered Iran state-of-the-art nuclear technology, the easing of some trade restrictions and other incentives such as support for a regional security dialogue. After receiving the offer, Iran had said it saw ambiguities that needed clarification. Iran's semi-official Fars news agency reported that 100 questions were attached to Iran's reply.


More Information on the Security Council
More Information on Nuclear Inspections and Possible UN Sanctions Against Iran
More Information on Iran

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C íŸ 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Policy Forum distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.