What should the IMF and World Bank do to lower the cost of development finance? Ahead of their 2026 Annual Meetings in Bangkok, we bring together perspectives from Africa, Latin America, India and Europe, with proposals for making finance more affordable, addressing unsustainable debt and supporting the clean energy transition.
What's New
Interview series #1: Amitabha Sarkar, Tampere University and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD)
As the task force working on the WHO-led reform process prepares its interim report by November, we ask global health experts: Can this process deliver a more equitable global health system?
Launching this week, our three-part interview series explores what meaningful reform would look like, whose voices are shaping the debate and whether countries and communities with less influence will gain greater control over the decisions that affect their health.
With their Annual Meetings in Bangkok approaching, it’s time to take stock of progress. Have the two Bretton Woods Institutions delivered more development finance, strengthened governance and expanded the role of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), the international reserve asset that the IMF can create?
The Annual Meetings also offer an opportunity to refocus the World Bank and direct it towards people and places where commercial banks do not operate. There is no shortage of banks on this planet that cater for wealthy countries and people. What is needed is a bank that caters for those left behind by other financial institutions.
Our issue areas
Publications
The debate over a global development agenda beyond 2030 has begun. One lesson should shape it from the outset: Ambitious goals are meaningless without the means to achieve them.
The 2030 Agenda was underfunded from the beginning: The financial framework the international community could agree on were never sufficient to make the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) achievable. The promised "billions to trillions" model - assuming that a few billion in public finance would mobilise trillions in private investment - never mobilised private capital at anywhere near the scale required.
Ten years [...]
This briefing analyses the political and structural causes behind the lack of progress in implementing the SDGs and discusses different options for an effective “Beyond 2030 Agenda”, from questions of development financing and international cooperation to a fundamental debate about the current understanding of development policy. It is the final publication by our former director Jens Martens, who passed away in May 2026. We publish it in grateful memory of his longstanding commitment to global justice and sustainable development.
Global health faces a profound structural crisis as public funding cuts and rising inequalities threaten the human right to health, leaving 4.5 billion people without basic services. Many now see an opportunity to bring in private actors to close the funding gap, with little critical scrutiny. Against this backdrop, Brot für die Welt, Global Policy Forum Europe and Misereor have outlined six theses on the role of private actors in global health, offering clear, actionable recommendations for the German government.
This briefing assesses the outcomes of the 2026 UN Financing for Development Forum, examining whether it delivered meaningful progress on implementing the Sevilla commitments or reflected broader paralysis in global economic governance. It finds that the forum largely failed to advance implementation, with weak outcomes, misplaced priorities in the agenda, and growing divergence among Member States limiting progress.


























